From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collins v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 27, 2013
Case No. 12-cv-13309 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 27, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 12-cv-13309

06-27-2013

PATRICK COLLINS, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOES 1-33, Defendants.


HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN


ORDER FINDING FEBRUARY 27, 2013 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [#26]

MOOT, JOHN DOE 27'S MOTION TO SEVER [#5] MOOT, JOHN DOE 28'S MOTION

TO QUASH SUBPOENA AND/OR SEVER [#8] MOOT, JOHN DOE 8'S MOTION TO

QUASH SUBPOENA AND/OR SEVER [#10] MOOT AND DISMISSING ACTION

This case is one among many cases filed nationwide by copyright owners alleging that John Doe defendants downloaded their films without authorization using a peer-to-peer ("P2P") file sharing network known as BitTorrent. On August 17, 2012, this Court granted Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Serve Third Party Subpoenas Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference so that Plaintiff could subpoena the third party service providers to ascertain the name, mailing address, and telephone number associated with the 33internet protocol addresses. Thereafter, John Does 8, 27 and 28 filed Motions to Quash and/or Sever. The motions were referred to Magistrate Judge Laurie J. Michelson for a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on February 27, 2013. Thereafter, on March 13, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal indicating that it voluntarily dismisses John Does 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33 without prejudice. On April 13, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal indicating that it voluntarily dismisses John Doe 28 with prejudice and consents to the Court closing this case.

Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed John Does 1-7 on November 23, 2012 without prejudice. See Dkt. No. 18.

Accordingly, because John Does 8, 27 and 28 have been dismissed from this action, the Report and Recommendation [#26] is MOOT.

John Doe 27's Motion to Sever [#5] is MOOT.

John Doe 28's Motion to Quash the Subpoena and/or Sever [#8] is MOOT.

John Doe 8's Motion to Quash the Subpoena and/or Sever [#10] is MOOT.

This cause of action is dismissed.

SO ORDERED.

_____________________________

GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE


Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record

on June 27, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.


Tanya Bankston

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Collins v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 27, 2013
Case No. 12-cv-13309 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Collins v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK COLLINS, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOES 1-33, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 27, 2013

Citations

Case No. 12-cv-13309 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 27, 2013)