From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collins v. Bauer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Feb 10, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00887-B (N.D. Tex. Feb. 10, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00887-B

02-10-2012

ANDREW COLLINS, Plaintiff, v. PAUL BAUER, et al, Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Defendant's 12 (b)(6) Motion; Alternative 7(a) Motion; and Brief in Support in Response to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, filed August 18,2011 (doc. 44), Defendant Randolph's Renewed Rule 12 Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings, and Brief filed August 18, 2011 (doc. 47), Defendant Randolph's Renewed Motion to Require Plaintiff to File a Reply Under Fed, R. Civ. P 7(a), and Brief, filed August 19, 2011 (doc. 49), Defendant Paul Bauer's Renewed Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings and Brief in Support, filed August 19, 2011 (doc. 52), and Defendant Paul Bauer's Renewed Motion for Ride 7 Reply and Brief in Support, filed August 22, 2011 (doc. 54). The motion to dismiss Plaintiff's bystander liability claim (doc. 44) is DENIED, the motion to dismiss Plaintiff's § 1985 conspiracy claim (doc. 44) is DENIED as moot, and the motions for partial judgment on the pleadings (docs. 47, 52) arc DENIED. so ordered.

________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Collins v. Bauer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Feb 10, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00887-B (N.D. Tex. Feb. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Collins v. Bauer

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW COLLINS, Plaintiff, v. PAUL BAUER, et al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Feb 10, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00887-B (N.D. Tex. Feb. 10, 2012)

Citing Cases

Vela v. Lewis

This exception frequently applies where it is alleged that police officers engaged in a conspiracy to conceal…

United States ex rel. Wuestenhoefer v. Jefferson

“It is a general principle in conspiracy law that a conspiracy requires two or more persons or entities.”…