Opinion
2:22-cv-00316-CDS-BNW
04-06-2023
ERIC COLLINS, an individual, Plaintiff v. AUTOZONERS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability corporation; JIMMY JAMES, an individual, DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES, I through X, inclusive, Defendants
HONE LAW JILL GARCIA ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF ERIC COLLINS MESSNER REEVES LLP JONATHAN B. OWENS, JONES WALKER LLP TRACY E. KERN P.J. KEE ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT AUTOZONERS, LLC
HONE LAW JILL GARCIA ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF ERIC COLLINS
MESSNER REEVES LLP JONATHAN B. OWENS, JONES WALKER LLP TRACY E. KERN P.J. KEE ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT AUTOZONERS, LLC
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO AUTOZONERS, LLC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(First Request)
Plaintiff Eric Collins (“Plaintiff') and Defendant AutoZoners, LLC (“AutoZoners”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby file this Stipulation and Order to Extend Deadline for Defendant to Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to AutoZoners Motion for Summary Judgment (First Request).
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendant shall have an extension up to and including April 18, 2023, to file its reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment filed on March 22, 2023 [ECF No. 47] (“Motion”). The requested extension is sought in good faith and not for purposes of undue delay. This Stipulation is submitted and based upon the following:
1. Defendant's counsel has a pre-planned vacation out of the country during the week the original deadline is due.
2. This is the first request for an extension of time for Defendant to file a reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.