From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collins v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 31, 2005
No. 1:05-cv-00541-OWW-DLB-HC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2005)

Opinion

No. 1:05-cv-00541-OWW-DLB-HC.

October 31, 2005


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 9) ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On August 31, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations that Grounds One, Two, and Four be DISMISSED for failure to state a cognizable federal claim. These Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that order. On September 20, 2005, Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 31, 2005, are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Grounds One, Two, and Four are DISMISSED for failure to state a cognizable federal claim; and

3. The matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Collins v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 31, 2005
No. 1:05-cv-00541-OWW-DLB-HC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2005)
Case details for

Collins v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:JESSE COLLINS, Petitioner, v. DERRAL ADAMS, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 31, 2005

Citations

No. 1:05-cv-00541-OWW-DLB-HC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2005)