From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collings v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 18, 1996
684 So. 2d 879 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-3722.

December 18, 1996.

Appeal from the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit Court, Martin County, John E. Fennelly, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sharon A. Wood, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Affirmed. As to the failure to instruct the jury on the fourth element of drug trafficking, as required by State v. Dominguez, 509 So.2d 917 (Fla. 1987), appellant's defense challenged his knowledge that packages containing any substance were in the vehicle he was driving, not his knowledge that the substances in the packages were cocaine and marijuana. Therefore, the failure to instruct was not fundamental error and required an objection to preserve the issue for appeal. State v. Delva, 575 So.2d 643 (Fla. 1991). The remaining issues as to the conviction were not preserved for appeal. However, the state concedes that the sentence for possession of marijuana with intent to sell/deliver exceeded the guidelines without written reasons for departure. We therefore reverse the sentence on count II and remand for resentencing within the guidelines.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded.

STONE, WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Collings v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 18, 1996
684 So. 2d 879 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Collings v. State

Case Details

Full title:PAUL COLLINGS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 18, 1996

Citations

684 So. 2d 879 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)