From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collier v. Aramark Food Services

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 1, 2011
No. CIV S-11-0370 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-0370 DAD P.

September 1, 2011


ORDER


By order filed July 19, 2011, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so would result in dismissal of this action. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Collier v. Aramark Food Services

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 1, 2011
No. CIV S-11-0370 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Collier v. Aramark Food Services

Case Details

Full title:CARL ERIC COLLIER, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 1, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-0370 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)