Opinion
2:22-cv-00678-RFB-BNW
08-31-2022
COLLEGIUM FUND LLC SERIES #31, a Nevada limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. NEWREZ LLC F/K/A NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC, D/B/A SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING; QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION; DOE individuals I through XX; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through XX, Defendants.
AKERMAN LLP ARIEL E. STERN, ESQ. NATALIE L. WINSLOW, ESQ. PAIGE L. MAGASTER, ESQ. Attorneys for NewRez LLC f/k/a New Penn Financial, LLC, d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing. CLARK NEWBERRY LAW FIRM AIMEE CLARK NEWBERRY, ESQ. Attorney for Collegium Fund LLC Series #31.
AKERMAN LLP ARIEL E. STERN, ESQ. NATALIE L. WINSLOW, ESQ. PAIGE L. MAGASTER, ESQ. Attorneys for NewRez LLC f/k/a New Penn Financial, LLC, d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing.
CLARK NEWBERRY LAW FIRM AIMEE CLARK NEWBERRY, ESQ. Attorney for Collegium Fund LLC Series #31.
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO EXPUNGE LIS PENDENS (FIRST REQUEST)
BRENDA WEKSLER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.
Plaintiff Collegium Fund LLC Series #31, and Defendant NewRez LLC f/k/a New Penn Financial, LLC, d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, hereby stipulate and agree that Shellpoint shall have an additional seven (7) days, up to and including September 6, 2022, to file its reply in support of its motion to expunge lis pendens, which is currently due on August 30, 2022.
Shellpoint filed its motion on July 19, 2022. ECF No. 16. The parties subsequently stipulated to extend Collegium's deadline to oppose the motion from August 2, 2022, to August 9, 2022. ECF No. 18. The parties again stipulated to extend Collegium's opposition deadline from August 9, 2022, to August 24, 2022. ECF No. 24. Collegium timely filed its opposition on August 23, 2022. ECF No. 29. Good cause exists to grant the requested extension. Shellpoint's counsel requests additional time to fully prepare and finalize its reply due to intervening briefing and discovery response deadlines and preparation for upcoming hearings on pending motions for protective orders in unrelated matters that have interfered with counsel's ability to do so. This is the parties' first request for an extension of this deadline, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.