From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collazo v. United States

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 27, 2024
CV 23-4445-SPG-AGR (C.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-4445-SPG-AGR

02-27-2024

Rosa Collazo v. United States of America


Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, on or before March 12, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiffs response. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Defendant's listed below have not answered the complaint, yet Plaintiff has failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a). Plaintiff can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.

• United States of America

• Federal Bureau of Investigation

• Jeff Stiff

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Collazo v. United States

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 27, 2024
CV 23-4445-SPG-AGR (C.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2024)
Case details for

Collazo v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Rosa Collazo v. United States of America

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 27, 2024

Citations

CV 23-4445-SPG-AGR (C.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2024)