From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collado v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 27, 1998
706 So. 2d 940 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

Case No. 96-02514.

Opinion filed February 27, 1998.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; J. Rogers Padgett, Judge.

Miriam L. Sumpter of Law Office of Miriam L. Sumpter, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and John M. Klawikofsky, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Collado appeals his convictions for armed burglary of a conveyance, armed grand theft, and grand theft. We affirm his convictions without discussion. However, we reverse the three-year minimum mandatory portion of his sentence.

Collado was given a three-year minimum mandatory sentence for his armed burglary conviction. In Poiteer v. State, 627 So.2d 526 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), this court held that section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1993), requires actual physical possession before a minimum mandatory term may be imposed for possession of a firearm. Here, there is no evidence in the record that Collado possessed a firearm. Therefore, the imposition of the three-year minimum mandatory sentence was improper.

Accordingly, we affirm Collado's convictions and reverse the three-year minimum mandatory sentence for his armed burglary conviction. His sentences are otherwise affirmed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Collado v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 27, 1998
706 So. 2d 940 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Collado v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID COLLADO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 27, 1998

Citations

706 So. 2d 940 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)