Opinion
Argued February 5, 1926 —
Decided March 26, 1926.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N.J. Mis. R. 869.
For the respondent, William C. Gebhardt Son.
For the appellant, Smith Smith and Edward A. Markley.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — TRENCHARD, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, HETFIELD, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.