Opinion
No. 06-75234.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed October 1, 2009.
Pablo Colin-Silva, San Diego, CA, pro se.
District Director, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Jeffery R. Leist, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A078-248-154.
Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Pablo Colin-Silva, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's order denying him adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing de novo questions of law, Singh v. INS, 213 F.3d 1050, 1052 (9th Cir. 2000), we deny the petition for review.
The agency properly deemed Colin-Silva inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(C)(i) for unlawful presence after a prior removal and correctly noted that Colin-Silva was ineligible for a waiver under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(C)(ii). The agency therefore properly denied Colin-Silva's application for adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i). See Matter of Briones, 24 I. N. Dec. 355, 371 (BIA 2007); Gonzales v. Dep't of Homeland Security, 508 F.3d 1227, 1242 (9th Cir. 2007).