From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coles v. Konviser

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2017
146 A.D.3d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

01-31-2017

In re Daquan COLES, Petitioner, v. Hon. Jill KONVISER, etc., et al., Respondents.


Daquan Coles, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for Hon. Jill Konviser, respondent.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (David Nasar of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., MANZANET–DANIELS, FEINMAN, WEBBER, GESMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Coles v. Konviser

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2017
146 A.D.3d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Coles v. Konviser

Case Details

Full title:In re Daquan COLES, Petitioner, v. Hon. Jill KONVISER, etc., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 31, 2017

Citations

146 A.D.3d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
146 A.D.3d 724
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 602