From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Yolo Cnty.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 20, 2021
2:21-cv-2328 AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-2328 AC P

12-20-2021

MARCELUS COLEMAN, Petitioner, v. YOLO COUNTY, Respondent.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to submit either the appropriate application in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an application in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. Petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.


Summaries of

Coleman v. Yolo Cnty.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 20, 2021
2:21-cv-2328 AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Coleman v. Yolo Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:MARCELUS COLEMAN, Petitioner, v. YOLO COUNTY, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 20, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-2328 AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)