From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Vallejo Police Department

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 22, 2010
No. CIV S-08-2959 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-2959 FCD KJM P.

July 22, 2010


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed May 13, 2010, plaintiff's amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twentyone days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Coleman v. Vallejo Police Department

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 22, 2010
No. CIV S-08-2959 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Coleman v. Vallejo Police Department

Case Details

Full title:DEMETRIUS COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. VALLEJO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 22, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-08-2959 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2010)