From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 25, 2001
790 So. 2d 576 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 3D01-1656

Opinion filed July 25, 2001.

An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court of Dade County, Maria E. Dennis, Judge. Lower Tribunal Case No. 96-8694.

Demetrius M. Coleman, in proper person. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GERSTEN and FLETCHER, JJ.


Major v. State, ___ So.2d ___ (Fla. 3d DCA July 15, 2001). As in Major we certify that we have passed on the following question of great public importance:

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

Affirmed; question certified.


Summaries of

Coleman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 25, 2001
790 So. 2d 576 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Coleman v. State

Case Details

Full title:DEMETRIUS M. COLEMAN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 25, 2001

Citations

790 So. 2d 576 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Saunders v. State

Affirmed. See Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla. 1999); Coleman v. State, 790 So.2d 576 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001);…