From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 8, 1992
595 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 92-0408.

April 8, 1992.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Leroy H. Moe, Judge.

Richard Coleman, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


After review of the record and initial brief, we conclude that appellant has failed to demonstrate a preliminary basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's order summarily, pursuant to rule 9.315(a), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. This affirmance is, however, without prejudice to appellant filing a motion in the trial court to withdraw his plea. See Meredith v. State, 508 So.2d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Fox v. State, 510 So.2d 310, 312 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Jolly v. State, 392 So.2d 54 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). See also Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267 (Fla. 1975).

DOWNEY, LETTS and WARNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Coleman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 8, 1992
595 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Coleman v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD COLEMAN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 8, 1992

Citations

595 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)