From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Jul 17, 2015
119 A.3d 42 (Del. 2015)

Opinion

No. 301, 2015.

07-17-2015

Devin COLEMAN, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.


ORDER

COLLINS J. SEITZ, JR., Justice.

This 17th day of July 2015, it appears to the Court that, on June 15, 2015, the appellant filed an appeal from a Superior Court Commissioner's order denying his motion for recusal. The Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for this Court's lack of jurisdiction to hear an interlocutory criminal appeal. The appellant failed to respond within the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.

We acknowledge Coleman's untimely response filed on July 6. Even if the Court were to consider his untimely filing, it would not change the outcome.

--------

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Coleman v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Jul 17, 2015
119 A.3d 42 (Del. 2015)
Case details for

Coleman v. State

Case Details

Full title:Devin COLEMAN, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.

Date published: Jul 17, 2015

Citations

119 A.3d 42 (Del. 2015)