From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Aug 16, 2016
197 So. 3d 637 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D16–2214.

08-16-2016

Nathan D. COLEMAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Nathan D. Coleman, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Tallahassee Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Nathan D. Coleman, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Tallahassee Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). We encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and RAY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Coleman v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Aug 16, 2016
197 So. 3d 637 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Coleman v. State

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN D. COLEMAN, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Aug 16, 2016

Citations

197 So. 3d 637 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)