From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Schwarzenegger

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 26, 2008
No. CIV S-90-0520 LKK JFM P (E.D.Cal.), No. C 01-1351 TEH (N.D.Cal.), No. C 05-05241 JSW (N.D.Cal.), No. C 94-2307 CW (N.D.Cal.) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-90-0520 LKK JFM P (E.D.Cal.), No. C 01-1351 TEH (N.D.Cal.), No. C 05-05241 JSW (N.D.Cal.), No. C 94-2307 CW (N.D.Cal.).

February 26, 2008


ORDER


The Receiver in Plata, the Special Master in Coleman, and the Court Representatives in Perez and Armstrong have presented to the judges in the above-captioned cases for review and approval an agreement that they have reached during the coordination meetings that they have held to date. By order filed November 13, 2007, the parties in the above-captioned cases were granted until November 26, 2007, to show cause why the attached agreement should not be adopted as an order of the court. On November 26, 2007, all parties filed responses to the order to show cause. Thereafter, by order filed November 30, 2007, the Plata Receiver, at his request, was granted fifteen days to file a response to the responses filed by the parties. The Receiver's response was filed on December 17, 2007.

The undersigned have reviewed, individually and jointly, the responses of the parties and of the Receiver. Good cause appearing, the construction agreement will be approved, subject to the following conditions. The Receiver shall file quarterly reports in each of the above-captioned cases concerning developments pertaining to the matters that are the subject of the construction agreement. In addition, the Receiver has indicated that he will be prepared to meet with the parties within the next sixty days concerning the status of the construction of 5,000 mental health beds and 5,000 medical beds that is the subject of paragraph 3 of the construction agreement. That will be the order of the undersigned.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The construction agreement appended to this order is approved;

2. The Plata Receiver shall file quarterly reports in each of the above-captioned cases concerning developments pertaining to matters that are the subject of the construction agreement;

3. The first such quarterly report shall be filed on or before March 15, 2008; and

4. Within sixty days from the date of this order the Plata Receiver shall meet with the parties to all of the above-captioned actions, the Coleman Special Master, and thePerez and Armstrong court representatives concerning the status of the construction of 5,000 mental health beds and 5,000 medical beds that is the subject of paragraph 3 of the construction agreement.

CONSTRUCTION

The Receiver in Plata has begun to implement three separate but related construction projects:

A. The construction of a medical center at San Quentin State Prison;
B. The addition of needed temporary and permanent clinical, office, supply, and record space at existing California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) adult prisons; and
C. The construction of approximately 5,000 additional CDCR medical beds and approximately 5,000 CDCR mental heath beds.

The actual number of medical and mental health beds to be constructed by the Receiver will depend upon site selection, contingency issues, determinations concerning what year to build out to, as well as possible coordination of construction with CDCR's AB 900 building projects.

The Office of the Receiver will assume leadership responsibility for each of the above referenced projects.

1. San Quentin Medical Center. The Plata receivership is the project lead for the San Quentin construction. The Medical Center, which has already been designed and for which construction has commenced, will provide additional reception, clinical, treatment, and office space for CDCR medical, mental health, and dental personnel. Medical Center facilities will be ADA compliant. Court representatives from Perez and Coleman as well as CDCR mental health and dental officials have been active participants in the design stage for this construction. The State has determined that funding for the San Quentin Medical Center will be provided through Assembly Bill (AB) 900 funds.

2. Additional temporary and permanent clinical, office, supply, and record space at CDCR prisons. The Plata receivership is the project lead for the additional medical construction projects at existing CDCR institutions. The Receiver is in the process of implementing his initial prison upgrade project at Avenal State Prison. Court representatives from Coleman and Perez have participated in this initial effort. The upgrades anticipated will be primarily medical; however the upgrades will be ADA compliant and will consider, when possible, some of the additional space needs of the CDCR mental health and dental programs. In this regard, the Court representatives in Armstrong, Coleman, and Perez agree to work with the Receiver by exploring with CDCR and their respective courts ways to effectuate the funding necessary for their specific programs in a timely and effective manner. This project will not involve the construction of the additional dental facilities necessary to effectuate the Perez roll-outs.

3. The construction of approximately 5,000 additional CDCR medical beds and approximately 5,000 CDCR mental heath beds. The Plata receivership is the project lead for the 5,000/10,000 bed construction project. URS Corporation, Bovis Lend Lease, Brookwood Program Management, Lee Burkhard Liu, and Robert Glass Associates will serve as the Receiver's Project Coordinator for 5,000/10,000 bed construction. The initial planning for design, site selection, and patient demographics will commence during August 2007.

Based on an initial review of the patient demographics by the Abt study, the Receiver anticipates that the majority of medical beds constructed will not be licensed. Given the significant need to coordinate the long-term treatment and care of mentally ill patients who also have serious medical problems, there exist both strong patient care and fiscal incentives to plan, design, and construct health care facilities that will effectuate coordinated medical and mental health treatment. Therefore, participation by Coleman representatives in this construction program is imperative. Likewise, the special needs of disabled and elderly prisoner/patients, who represent a significant number of patients who require improved housing, warrant participation by an expert in accessibility for persons with disabilities. The Court expert in Armstrong and the Receiver in Plata mutually selected such an expert who will be added to the program and who will communicate with both the Armstrong court expert and the Receiver about his recommendations. The new facilities will be designed and built to be in full compliance with applicable ADA requirements for both staff and inmates, including applicable accessibility provisions of the ADA Accessibility Guidelines, the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards, and California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, California Building Code (CBC). The Receiver also intends to construct adequate dental clinics and other necessary dental program space in order to provide Perez standards of care for the prisoner/patients housed in the 5,000/10,000 bed facilities. Therefore, participation by a Perez representative will be necessary to coordinate dental construction design and planning. In this regard, the Court representatives in Armstrong, Coleman, and Perez agree to work with the Receiver by exploring with CDCR and their respective courts ways to effectuate the funding necessary for their specific programs in a timely and effective manner.

This project will not involve the construction of the additional dental facilities necessary to effectuate the Perez roll-outs.

The State has determined that funding for an 8,000-beds construction project will be provided through AB 900 funds. The Coleman Special Master and the Plata Receiver have indicated that up to 10,000 beds may be necessary. Whether the projected funding is adequate for the necessary construction will be determined by the Receiver after site selection issues, coordination issues, and design issues are resolved.


Summaries of

Coleman v. Schwarzenegger

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 26, 2008
No. CIV S-90-0520 LKK JFM P (E.D.Cal.), No. C 01-1351 TEH (N.D.Cal.), No. C 05-05241 JSW (N.D.Cal.), No. C 94-2307 CW (N.D.Cal.) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2008)
Case details for

Coleman v. Schwarzenegger

Case Details

Full title:RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 26, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-90-0520 LKK JFM P (E.D.Cal.), No. C 01-1351 TEH (N.D.Cal.), No. C 05-05241 JSW (N.D.Cal.), No. C 94-2307 CW (N.D.Cal.) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2008)