From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Pauma Realty Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 21, 1959
17 Misc. 2d 873 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)

Opinion

May 21, 1959

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, Bronx County HYMAN KORN, J.

Tropp Steinbock ( I. Sidney Worthman of counsel), for appellant.

Fritz W. Alexander, II, for respondents.


Plaintiffs have failed to present a valid excuse for the delay of 2 years and 11 months in failing to place the case upon the Trial Calendar after the joinder of issue. It is clear that this is the typical case of delay condemned by the Appellate Division in Lakowitz v. Marlin Gardens ( 5 A.D.2d 981).

The order appealed from should be modified by eliminating therefrom the conditional provision allowing plaintiffs to transfer the case to the Municipal Court, and as modified the order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J.P., HECHT and AURELIO, JJ.

Order modified, etc.


Summaries of

Coleman v. Pauma Realty Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 21, 1959
17 Misc. 2d 873 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
Case details for

Coleman v. Pauma Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:UZELLA COLEMAN et al., Respondents, v. PAUMA REALTY CORP., Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: May 21, 1959

Citations

17 Misc. 2d 873 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
186 N.Y.S.2d 796

Citing Cases

Geh v. Mezey

The plaintiff has failed to sustain his burden of excusing the delay. ( Friedlander v. Roxy Theatre, 204…