From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Nassau County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 2003
2 A.D.3d 562 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-10290.

Decided December 15, 2003.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for alleged civil rights violations, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), entered October 18, 2002, which granted the defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

Ronald Coleman, Hempstead, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Lorna B. Goodman, County Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Gerald R. Podlesak and David B. Goldin of counsel), for respondent.

Before: HOWARD MILLER, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. The complaint was unintelligible, and lacked specificity and any legally cognizable claim ( see Kung v. Pan, 285 A.D.2d 532).

RITTER, J.P., SMITH, FRIEDMANN, H. MILLER and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Coleman v. Nassau County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 2003
2 A.D.3d 562 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Coleman v. Nassau County

Case Details

Full title:RONALD COLEMAN, appellant, v. NASSAU COUNTY, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 15, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 562 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
768 N.Y.S.2d 371

Citing Cases

Tucci v. Talon Seafood South, Inc.

We agree with the defendants that the twelfth cause of action, as pleaded, fails to state any legally…

Coleman v. New York

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ., Concur. This complaint against the New…