From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Mettler-Toledo, Inc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 3, 1995
212 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 3, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion by denying plaintiff a continuance to respond to the motion for summary judgment of defendant Mettler-Toledo, Inc. Plaintiff failed to demonstrate good cause for a continuance (see, Henderson v. Stilwell, 116 A.D.2d 861, 862, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 606; Wallin v. Wallin, 34 A.D.2d 870; Hubbell Elec. v. State of New York, 153 Misc.2d 810, 813-814).


Summaries of

Coleman v. Mettler-Toledo, Inc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 3, 1995
212 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Coleman v. Mettler-Toledo, Inc

Case Details

Full title:JASON COLEMAN, Appellant, v. METTLER-TOLEDO, INC., Respondent, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 3, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 989