From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Kernan

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 23, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1583 ALA P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1583 ALA P.

October 23, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Coleman v. Kernan

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 23, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1583 ALA P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2007)
Case details for

Coleman v. Kernan

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY V. COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 23, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1583 ALA P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2007)