From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Howard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE
Oct 21, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13CV-663-H (W.D. Ky. Oct. 21, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13CV-663-H

2013-10-21

WARDELL COLEMAN PETITIONER v. GREGORY HOWARD, Warden RESPONDENT


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Petitioner, Wardell Coleman, has filed a federal habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S. § 2254. He did so without first filing in state court to vacate or otherwise set aside his conviction pursuant to the Kentucky Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 11.42. This Court referred the matter to the Magistrate Judge who recommended dismissal without prejudice. Petitioner has filed an objection.

The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendation and agrees with them entirely. Further, the Court does not believe that any further discussion is necessary.

Being otherwise sufficiently advised,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED in full and the Petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the certificate of appealability is DENIED.

John G. Heyburn II, Judge

United States District Court
cc: Wardell Coleman, Pro Se

Counsel of Record

Magistrate Judge Dave Whalin


Summaries of

Coleman v. Howard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE
Oct 21, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13CV-663-H (W.D. Ky. Oct. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Coleman v. Howard

Case Details

Full title:WARDELL COLEMAN PETITIONER v. GREGORY HOWARD, Warden RESPONDENT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE

Date published: Oct 21, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13CV-663-H (W.D. Ky. Oct. 21, 2013)