Coleman v. Fox

Full title: In the Matter of Carmen COLEMAN, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Tracy FOX…

Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 16, 2012

93 A.D.3d 1188 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 1910

939 N.Y.S.2d 896

Opinion

2012-03-16

In the Matter of Carmen COLEMAN, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Tracy FOX, Respondent–Respondent. (Appeal No. 2.)

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Dandrea L. Ruhlmann, J.), entered September 17, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order denied the motion of petitioner for attorneys' fees.Carmen Coleman, petitioner-appellant pro se. Tracy Fox, respondent-respondent pro se.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Dandrea L. Ruhlmann, J.), entered September 17, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order denied the motion of petitioner for attorneys' fees.Carmen Coleman, petitioner-appellant pro se. Tracy Fox, respondent-respondent pro se.

Michael A. Rosenbloom, Attorney for the Child, Rochester, for Justin F.

Same Memorandum as in Matter of Fox v. Coleman, ––– A.D.3d ––––, 939 N.Y.S.2d 786, 2012 WL 895458 [Mar. 16, 2012].

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, FAHEY, CARNI, and SCONIERS, JJ., concur.