From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Duluth Police Department

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Apr 12, 2010
371 F. App'x 712 (8th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-2002.

Submitted: April 7, 2010.

Filed: April 12, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.


[UNPUBLISHED]


Douglas Coleman appeals the district court's adverse grant of motions to dismiss and for summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Following careful de novo review of the record, we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Coleman's pending motion.

The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.


Summaries of

Coleman v. Duluth Police Department

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Apr 12, 2010
371 F. App'x 712 (8th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Coleman v. Duluth Police Department

Case Details

Full title:Douglas Hiram COLEMAN, Appellant, v. DULUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Apr 12, 2010

Citations

371 F. App'x 712 (8th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Howard v. Weidemann

As the purpose of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is to enforce the provisions of the fourteenth amendment, it follows that…