Opinion
21-cv-13061
05-12-2022
Raynard D. Coleman, Plaintiff, v. Corizon, et al., Defendants.
Mag. Judge Anthony P. Patti
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [28]
Judith E. Levy, United States District Judge
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 28) recommending the Court deny without prejudice Plaintiff Raynard D. Coleman's motion for preliminary injunction. (ECF No. 3.) The parties were required to file specific written objections, if any, within fourteen days of service. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The Court has nevertheless carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concurs in the reasoning and result. Accordingly,
Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction is dated September 14, 2021 (see ECF No. 3, PageID.249), but it was not docketed until December 29, 2021.
The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 28) is ADOPTED; and
Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (ECF No. 3) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
By failing to object to the Report and Recommendation, the parties have forfeited any further right of appeal. See United States v. Wandahsega, 924 F.3d 868, 878 (6th Cir. 2019); see also Berkshire v. Beauvais, 928 F.3d 520, 530 (6th Cir. 2019).
IT IS SO ORDERED.