Coleman v. Cook

Full title: EDWARD COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. LIEUTENANT COOK, et al. Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Sep 22, 2009

CV 08-1665 AHM (FMO) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2009)

Opinion

EDWARD COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. LIEUTENANT COOK, et al. Defendants. No. CV 08-1665 AHM (FMO) United States District Court, C.D. California. September 22, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          A. HOWARD MATZ, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Second Amended Complaint, all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. The Court approves and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

         1. Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action without prejudice.

         2. The Clerk shall serve copies of this Order and the Judgment on all parties.