From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Catalyst Prop. Sols.

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Jun 8, 2017
NO. 01-17-00119-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 8, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 01-17-00119-CV

06-08-2017

SHAUNITA COLEMAN, Appellant v. CATALYST PROPERTY SOLUTIONS AS AGENT FOR KIN MAN, Appellee


On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Fort Bend County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 16-CCV-058770

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Shaunita Coleman, has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also Tex. GOV'T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.851(b), 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013 & Supp. 2016); Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk's record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Lloyd.


Summaries of

Coleman v. Catalyst Prop. Sols.

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Jun 8, 2017
NO. 01-17-00119-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 8, 2017)
Case details for

Coleman v. Catalyst Prop. Sols.

Case Details

Full title:SHAUNITA COLEMAN, Appellant v. CATALYST PROPERTY SOLUTIONS AS AGENT FOR…

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Jun 8, 2017

Citations

NO. 01-17-00119-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 8, 2017)