From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 24, 2011
Case No. Civ S 90-0520 LKK-JFM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. Civ S 90-0520 LKK-JFM

10-24-2011

RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., et al., Defendants.

ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP Ernest Galvan Attorneys for Plaintiffs CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Debbie Vorous Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants


DONALD SPECTER - 083925

STEVEN FAMA - 099641

PRISON LAW OFFICE

CLAUDIA CENTER - 158255

THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY

EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

MICHAEL W. BIEN - 096891

ERNEST GALVAN - 196065

AARON J. FISCHER - 247391

ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP

WARREN E. GEORGE - 053588

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME IN WHICH TO FILE

MOTION FOR FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES RELATED TO WORK BEFORE THREE-JUDGE COURT

AND SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Judge: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

1. On June 15, 2011, the Court granted an extension to the stay of all attorneys' fees, costs and expenses matters related to the Three-Judge Court, and related appeals, including the proceedings before the Supreme Court of the United States, ordering that Plaintiffs' application for fees, costs and expenses be submitted 60 days after August 26, 2011.

2. The parties continue to meet and confer regarding Plaintiffs' attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses. These fees, costs, and expenses are separate from those approved in the recent order issued by the court in Plata v. Brown. (See Coleman Docket No. 4094.) The purpose of this meet and confer process has been to exhaust any possibility of settling these matters, or of narrowing the disputes as much as possible. In order to allow that process to continue and, if possible, to succeed, the parties jointly request a further extension that provides additional time to meet and confer.

3. The parties therefore request that the Court extend the deadline for filing the fees and costs application for matters related to the Three-Judge Court, and related appeals, including the appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States to November 18, 2011. The parties agree that the hearing will not be noticed for December 9th or 16th, 2011.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP

By: Ernest Galvan

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

By: Debbie Vorous

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, this Court extends the stay of all outstanding attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses matters related to the Three-Judge Court, and related appeals, including the proceedings before the Supreme Court of the United States. The unresolved fees, costs, and expenses related to these proceedings are separate from the fees, costs, and expenses that have been resolved by stipulation between the Prison Law Office and Defendants and the Plata v. Brown court's order. Plaintiffs shall submit their motion for fees, costs, and expenses on the aforementioned matter no later than November 18, 2011. For the duration of the stay, any and all deadlines relating to motions or claims for attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses contained in the Federal Civil Rules, the Federal Appellate Rules, the U.S. Supreme Court Rules, and/or the Local Rules for the Eastern District of California do not apply.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Coleman v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 24, 2011
Case No. Civ S 90-0520 LKK-JFM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Coleman v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Citations

Case No. Civ S 90-0520 LKK-JFM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)