From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AND THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT COMPOSED OF THREE JUDGES PURSUANT TO SECTION 2284, TITLE 28 UNITED STATES CODE
Oct 13, 2011
CASE NO. 2:90-CV-00520 LKK JFM P (N.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:90-CV-00520 LKK JFM P CASE NO. C01-1351 TEH

10-13-2011

RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR, et al., Defendants. MARCIANO PLATA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR et al., Defendants.

HANSON BRIDGET LLP PAUL B. MELLO Attorneys for Defendants ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE DANIELLE F. O'BANNON Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants PRISON LAW OFFICE DONALD SPECTER Attorneys for Plaintiffs


KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

JONATHAN L. WOLFF

senior Assistant Attorney General

DEBBIE VOROUS

WILLIAM KWONG

KYLE A. LEWIS

DANIELLE F. O'BANNON

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants

HANSON BRIDGET LLP

PAUL B. MELLO

JERROLD C. SCHAEFER

WALTER R. SCHNEIDER

MEGAN C. OLIVER THOMPSON

SAMANTHA D. WOLFF

RENJU P. JACOB

PAUL B. GRUWELL

THREE-JUDGE COURT

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER REGARDING ATTORNEYS'

FEES, EXPENSES, AND COSTS

All matters concerning attorneys' fees, expenses, and costs arising out of the three-judge court litigation were stayed pending the U.S. Supreme Court's decision. (See Plata Docket 2321, 2344; Coleman Docket 3948, 2977.) On May 23, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision affirming the three-judge court's order. Defendants and the Prison Law Office submit this stipulation concerning the Prison Law Office's attorneys' fees, expenses, and costs arising out of the three-judge court litigation through June 30, 2011.

Plaintiffs are represented by multiple law firms in this litigation. One law firm is the Prison Law Office. Defendants and the Prison Law Office completed their meet and confer process on October 4, 2011, and have successfully narrowed the dispute and reached a resolution in the amount of $2,184,759, for all fees, costs, and expenses related to, incurred by, and associated with the Prison Law Office's attorneys' fees, expenses, and costs for the three-judge court proceedings, including all work before the district court, the three-judge court, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Supreme Court, incurred through June 30, 2011.

The parties agree that Defendants will not pay any multiplier and the Prison Law Office agrees to discount its demand for attorneys' fees, expenses, and costs as set forth above. The Prison Law Office waives any and all rights associated with any further payment of fees, expenses, costs, or compensation of any kind associated with the three-judge court proceedings through June 30, 2011. Defendants will pay $2,184,759 within 14 days of the date of execution of this stipulation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

HANSON BRIDGET LLP

PAUL B. MELLO

Attorneys for Defendants

ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE

DANIELLE F. O'BANNON

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants

PRISON LAW OFFICE

DONALD SPECTER

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Judge Thelton E. Henderson


Summaries of

Coleman v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AND THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT COMPOSED OF THREE JUDGES PURSUANT TO SECTION 2284, TITLE 28 UNITED STATES CODE
Oct 13, 2011
CASE NO. 2:90-CV-00520 LKK JFM P (N.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Coleman v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AND THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT COMPOSED OF THREE JUDGES PURSUANT TO SECTION 2284, TITLE 28 UNITED STATES CODE

Date published: Oct 13, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 2:90-CV-00520 LKK JFM P (N.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)