From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Brand

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jun 17, 2024
3:23-cv-06135-DGE (W.D. Wash. Jun. 17, 2024)

Opinion

3:23-cv-06135-DGE

06-17-2024

CHARLES V. COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. DAVID R. BRAND, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

David G. Estudillo United States District Judge.

On May 3, 2024, Defendant Secretary Wormuth moved to dismiss this action. (Dkt. No. 26.) Plaintiff Charles Coleman failed to timely respond, and the motion to dismiss is now ripe. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(b)(2), a party's failure to timely oppose a motion to dismiss “may be considered . . . as an admission that the motion has merit.” Should Plaintiff wish to proceed with this action, Plaintiff SHALL show cause as to why this action should not be dismissed no later than July 5, 2024 .


Summaries of

Coleman v. Brand

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jun 17, 2024
3:23-cv-06135-DGE (W.D. Wash. Jun. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Coleman v. Brand

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES V. COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. DAVID R. BRAND, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jun 17, 2024

Citations

3:23-cv-06135-DGE (W.D. Wash. Jun. 17, 2024)