From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Bradshaw

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Mar 7, 2013
Case No. 3:03-cv-299 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 7, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:03-cv-299

03-07-2013

TIMOTHY L. COLEMAN, Petitioner, v. MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden, Respondent.


District Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


RECOMMITTAL ORDER

This capital habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (Doc. No. 201) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations (Doc. No. 198). Respondent's time to file a reply to the Objections has not yet expired.

The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and Response and making recommendations based on that analysis.

________________

EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Coleman v. Bradshaw

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Mar 7, 2013
Case No. 3:03-cv-299 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Coleman v. Bradshaw

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY L. COLEMAN, Petitioner, v. MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Mar 7, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:03-cv-299 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 7, 2013)