Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Coleman, Alias v. State

108 Tex. Crim. 323 (Tex. Crim. App. 1927)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Coleman, Alias v. State

3 Citing cases

  1. Fogel v. United States

    167 F.2d 763 (5th Cir. 1948)   Cited 6 times

    Gwinn v. United States, 5 Cir., 294 F. 878, 880; Payton v. Ideal Jewelry Mfg. Co., 1 Cir., 7 F.2d 113, 114; Coleman v. State, 108 Tex.Crim. R., 300 S.W. 59, 60; Emanuel v. State, 112 Tex.Crim. R., 16 S.W.2d 1083, 1084.

  2. Drew v. State

    743 S.W.2d 207 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987)   Cited 269 times
    Holding trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider motion for new trial alleging newly discovered evidence filed seventy-one days after the filing deadline

    United States v. Vergara, 714 F.2d 21, 22 (5th Cir. 1983); United States v.Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 407 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. den. 456 U.S. 943, 102 S.Ct. 2007, 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); Wharton's Criminal Procedure, Vol. 4, § 599, p. 177, and cases there cited; Tex.Jur.3d, Vol. 25, Criminal Law, § 3487, p. 357, Coleman v. State, 108 Tex.Crim. R., 300 S.W. 59 (1927); Deuran v. State, 134 Tex.Crim. 433, 115 S.W.2d 945 (1938). Generally, the discovery after trial of new evidence material to the defendant constitutes a ground for new trial.

  3. Cooke v. State

    24 S.W.2d 427 (Tex. Crim. App. 1930)

    The action in overruling a motion for a new trial, based on newly discovered evidence will not be revised unless it is apparent that the discretion vested in the trial judge has been abused to the prejudice of the accused. Coleman v. State, 300 S.W. 59. Failing to find reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.