From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colella v. Colella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 2004
11 A.D.3d 576 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-09983

October 18, 2004.

In an action to rescind a deed, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated November 5, 2003, which denied his motion to recuse Justice Hart from presiding over any further proceedings in connection with the action.

Before: Smith, J.P., Adams, Crane and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff failed to set forth any demonstrable proof of bias to warrant the conclusion that Justice Hart's failure to recuse himself was an improvident exercise of discretion ( see Matter of Firestone v. Siems, 272 AD2d 544, 545; Anjam v. Anjam, 191 AD2d 531, 533; Manhattan School of Music v. Solow, 175 AD2d 106, 109; see also People v. Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 406; People v. Taylor, 142 AD2d 410, 420, affd 75 NY2d 277; People v. Bartolomeo, 126 AD2d 375, 391; Matter of Johnson v. Hornblass, 93 AD2d 732, 733; People v. Brown, 141 AD2d 657, 658).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Colella v. Colella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 2004
11 A.D.3d 576 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Colella v. Colella

Case Details

Full title:ANGELO COLELLA, Appellant, v. MARIA COLELLA, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 18, 2004

Citations

11 A.D.3d 576 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
782 N.Y.S.2d 669

Citing Cases

Tornheim v. Tornheim

Absent a legal disqualification under Judiciary Law § 14, a court is the sole arbiter of its recusal (see…

Montesdeoca v. Montesdeoca

Absent a ground for disqualification under Judiciary Law § 14, a trial judge is the sole arbiter of whether…