From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cole v. Tennessee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Mar 29, 2013
No. 3:12-cv-0332 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 29, 2013)

Opinion

No. 3:12-cv-0332

03-29-2013

ROBERT E. COLE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF TENNESSEE, et al., Defendants.


Judge Sharp

Magistrate Judge Bryant


ORDER

Plaintiff Robert Cole, a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint on April 2, 2012, against multiple defendants, including Paul Alexander, M.D., wherein he asserted numerous constitutional and statutory claims for purported violations of his constitutional rights. See (Docket Entry No. 1 and 11, Complaint).

Pending before the Court is Paul Alexander M.D.'s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Docket Entry No. 50). Plaintiff did not file a response in opposition to the motion.

Magistrate Judge Bryant entered a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Docket Entry No. 73) in this case on March 6, 2013, concluding "plaintiff's allegations against defendant Alexander... do not contain enough facts to make plaintiff's claim against this defendant plausible, as required by Ashcroft v. Iqbal." (Id. at 4). Therefore, recommending that "defendant Alexander's motion to dismiss be GRANTED, and the complaint against him [be] DISMISSED with prejudice." (Id.). No objections were made to the R & R.

Where no objections are made to the R & R, "[t]he district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Having thoroughly reviewed the record in this case and the applicable law in accordance with Rule 72(b), the Court will accept the R & R.

Accordingly, the Court hereby rules as follows:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 73) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED;

(2) Paul Alexander M.D.'s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claims (Docket Entry No. 50) is hereby GRANTED; and

(3) The claims against Defendant Alexander are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

This action is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 for claims against the remaining defendants.

It is SO ORDERED.

________

KEVIN H. SHARP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cole v. Tennessee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Mar 29, 2013
No. 3:12-cv-0332 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Cole v. Tennessee

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT E. COLE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF TENNESSEE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 29, 2013

Citations

No. 3:12-cv-0332 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 29, 2013)