From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cole v. Teamsaters Local, Union No. 391

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Mar 30, 2009
1:08CV499 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2009)

Opinion

1:08CV499.

March 30, 2009


ORDER


On October 30, 2008, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed, and notice was served on Plaintiff. Within the time limitation set forth in the statute, Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation (Doc. 17), and Defendants filed a response (Doc. 18).

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination, which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. 6) be GRANTED. A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Cole v. Teamsaters Local, Union No. 391

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Mar 30, 2009
1:08CV499 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Cole v. Teamsaters Local, Union No. 391

Case Details

Full title:RAY A. COLE, Plaintiff, pro se, v. TEAMSTERS LOCAL, UNION NO. 391 and…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Mar 30, 2009

Citations

1:08CV499 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2009)