From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cole v. Sunbeam Corporation

Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A
Sep 26, 1956
89 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 1956)

Opinion

September 26, 1956.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Stanley Milledge, Judge.

Eugene C. Heiman (of Myers, Heiman Kaplan), Miami, for appellant.

Douglas D. Batchelor, Earl D. Waldin, Jr., Miami, Herman T. Van Mell (of Finn Van Mell), Chicago, Ill., for appellee.


This cause came on to be heard on the motion of the appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly, Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C.J., and HOBSON, ROBERTS and THORNAL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cole v. Sunbeam Corporation

Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A
Sep 26, 1956
89 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 1956)
Case details for

Cole v. Sunbeam Corporation

Case Details

Full title:EARL COLE, D/B/A COLE SONS, APPELLANT, v. SUNBEAM CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A

Date published: Sep 26, 1956

Citations

89 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 1956)