From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cole v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 22, 2006
944 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 2006)

Opinion

SC06-1720.

November 22, 2006.


Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to have another judicial circuit adjudicate claims made in his motion for postconviction relief, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (stating that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, petitioner must show clear legal right to performance of requested act, that respondent has indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).

The "Supplement to Petitioner's Petition for Mandamus Writ, and Motion for Counsel Appointment" is hereby dismissed as moot.

Any motions or other requests for relief are also denied.

WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cole v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 22, 2006
944 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 2006)
Case details for

Cole v. State

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY ALLEN COLE, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Nov 22, 2006

Citations

944 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 2006)