Opinion
SC06-1720.
November 22, 2006.
Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to have another judicial circuit adjudicate claims made in his motion for postconviction relief, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (stating that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, petitioner must show clear legal right to performance of requested act, that respondent has indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).
The "Supplement to Petitioner's Petition for Mandamus Writ, and Motion for Counsel Appointment" is hereby dismissed as moot.
Any motions or other requests for relief are also denied.
WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.