Opinion
CASE NO. 3:19-cv-1481-G-BN
11-13-2020
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. The plaintiff filed a motion that she styled as a Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. Because there was no judgment entered at that time, and because the motion was in substance objecting to the Magistrate Judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendation, the court construed plaintiff's motion as objections. The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
SO ORDERED. November 13, 2020.
/s/ _________
A. JOE FISH
Senior United States District Judge