From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cole v. People

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 5, 2010
No. CIV S-09-2549 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-2549 LKK DAD P.

November 5, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. As the court previously advised petitioner, there currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings.See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's October 28, 2010 motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 33) is denied.

DATED: November 4, 2010.


Summaries of

Cole v. People

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 5, 2010
No. CIV S-09-2549 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2010)
Case details for

Cole v. People

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY MARK COLE, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 5, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-09-2549 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2010)