From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cole v. Halsted Fin. Servs., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
May 24, 2017
Case No: 2:16-cv-754-FtM-99MRM (M.D. Fla. May. 24, 2017)

Opinion

Case No: 2:16-cv-754-FtM-99MRM

05-24-2017

CHARLES COLE, Plaintiff, v. HALSTED FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, SYED ALI, PRAN NAVANANDAN and DOE 1-5, Defendants.


ORDER

This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default against Defendant Syed Ali (Doc. 35) filed on May 5, 2017. Plaintiff requests that the Court enter a default against Defendant for failure to plead or otherwise defend pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). (Doc. 35 at 1). Plaintiff filed a Proof of Service (Doc. 34) and attached an Affidavit in Support (Doc. 35-1).

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), "[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default." Prior to directing the Clerk to enter a default, however, the Court must first determine whether Plaintiff properly effectuated service of process. Chambers v. Halsted Fin. Servs., LLC, 2:13-cv-809-FTM-38, 2014 WL 3721209, at *1 (M.D. Fla. July 28, 2014). Plaintiff has the burden of establishing effective service of process. See Zamperla, Inc. v. S.B.F. S.R.L, No. 6:13-cv-1811-Orl-37KRS, 2014 WL 1400641, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 10, 2014).

Service on an individual may be effectuated by "delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the individual personally." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(2)(A). In this instance, the Proof of Service states that Defendant was personally served with a copy of the summons. (Doc. 34 at 2). Additionally, the Affidavit in Support states that service of process was had on Defendant Syed Ali personally. (Doc. 35-1 at 1). By personally serving Defendant Syed Ali, the Court finds that service was properly effectuated. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(2)(A). Additionally, Defendant has failed to file any documents in this case or otherwise defend this action as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Therefore, an entry of default by the Clerk of Court is appropriate against Defendant Syed Ali.

Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that:

1) Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default against Defendant Syed Ali (Doc. 35) is GRANTED.

2) The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a default against Defendant Syed Ali.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on May 24, 2017.

/s/_________

MAC R. MCCOY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties


Summaries of

Cole v. Halsted Fin. Servs., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
May 24, 2017
Case No: 2:16-cv-754-FtM-99MRM (M.D. Fla. May. 24, 2017)
Case details for

Cole v. Halsted Fin. Servs., LLC

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES COLE, Plaintiff, v. HALSTED FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, SYED ALI…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: May 24, 2017

Citations

Case No: 2:16-cv-754-FtM-99MRM (M.D. Fla. May. 24, 2017)