From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colden v. Broadway State Bank

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Jan 25, 1936
11 Cal.App.2d 428 (Cal. Ct. App. 1936)

Opinion

Docket No. 9556.

January 25, 1936.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from orders and rulings in reference thereto. Guy F. Bush, Judge. Judgment affirmed; appeal from orders and rulings dismissed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Edwin J. Miller for Appellant.

Bicksler, Parke Catlin for Respondents.


The decisive question involved in this appeal is, whether the court abused its discretion in refusing plaintiff's motion to strike out certain portions of the complaint. [1] It is well settled that this question is one which addresses itself to the sound discretion of the trial court. There is nothing in the record which reveals that such discretion was abused. The complaint, with or without the portion sought to be stricken, would not state a cause of action. There was also no error under the circumstances in the granting of a nonsuit.

Judgment is affirmed. [2] The notice of appeal, in addition to the appeal from the judgment, contains the following: "and from all orders and rulings made by the court in reference thereto". The portion of the notice just quoted is superfluous and, whatever it means, the appeals from such "orders and rulings" are dismissed.

Houser, P.J., and York, J., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on March 19, 1936.


Summaries of

Colden v. Broadway State Bank

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Jan 25, 1936
11 Cal.App.2d 428 (Cal. Ct. App. 1936)
Case details for

Colden v. Broadway State Bank

Case Details

Full title:C.J. COLDEN, Appellant, v. BROADWAY STATE BANK (a Banking Corporation) et…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One

Date published: Jan 25, 1936

Citations

11 Cal.App.2d 428 (Cal. Ct. App. 1936)
53 P.2d 983

Citing Cases

Lancaster Security Inv. Corp. v. Kessler

The quoted portion of the notice of appeal is wholly ineffective for at least two reasons: (1) It does not…

Clements v. T.R. Bechtel Co.

Also stricken from the complaint were the allegations setting forth the statements contained in the claim of…