From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colbert v. International Security Bureau, S. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 29, 1980
406 N.E.2d 1080 (N.Y. 1980)

Opinion

Argued March 24, 1980

Decided April 29, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, FRANKLIN W. MORTON, J.

M. Elizabeth Kilcullen and Arthur F. Golden for appellant.

Francis E. Dorn for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the affirmative.

Based on the record before us, we agree with the Appellate Division that the employee receiving service possessed sufficient authority to accept service of process on behalf of appellant Southern Railway Co. (See Fashion Page v Zurich Ins. Co., 50 N.Y.2d 265.)

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUSCHBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed, etc.


Summaries of

Colbert v. International Security Bureau, S. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 29, 1980
406 N.E.2d 1080 (N.Y. 1980)
Case details for

Colbert v. International Security Bureau, S. Ry. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE COLBERT et al., Respondents, v. INTERNATIONAL SECURITY BUREAU…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 29, 1980

Citations

406 N.E.2d 1080 (N.Y. 1980)
406 N.E.2d 1080
429 N.Y.S.2d 187

Citing Cases

Colbert v. International Security Bureau, Inc.

This case presents two questions concerning the defense of lack of in personam jurisdiction; one is…

Mughal v. Yaqoob

Moreover, the defendant waived any objections to personal jurisdiction he might have otherwise asserted by…