From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colbert v. Harris Teeter, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Columbia
May 18, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-503 (JDB) (D.D.C. May. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-503 (JDB).

May 18, 2011


MEMORANDUM


Plaintiff filed this action in Superior Court against defendant Harris Teeter, Inc., complaining that his attempt to eat dinner at defendant's establishment was interrupted by security personnel who harassed him. Defendant removed the case and has now moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and has alternatively moved for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). See Mot. to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for J. on the Pleadings, ECF No. 4. The Court ordered plaintiff to respond to defendant's motion on or before May 9, 2011 and warned plaintiff that failure to timely respond could result in defendant's motion being granted as conceded. Order, ECF No. 5. To date, plaintiff has not filed any response. The Court will therefore grant the motion to dismiss as conceded and dismiss this case. A separate order consistent with this Memorandum shall issue this date.


Summaries of

Colbert v. Harris Teeter, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Columbia
May 18, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-503 (JDB) (D.D.C. May. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Colbert v. Harris Teeter, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO COLBERT, Plaintiff, v. HARRIS TEETER, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: May 18, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-503 (JDB) (D.D.C. May. 18, 2011)

Citing Cases

Colbert v. Cincinnati Police Dep't

In a relatively short time after removal, however, 10 of those cases were dismissed as either frivolous, on a…