From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colandria v. China Mut. Steam Navigation Co., LTD

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

March, 1929.


Judgment reversed upon the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Plaintiff's decedent was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law in proceeding in the dark corridor when there was no special stress of circumstances requiring him to proceed without first finding out whether there were obstructions to his safe progress. Especially is this so, when defendant furnished a safe means of exit that eliminated the necessity of decedent proceeding into the dark corridor. ( Rohrbacher v. Gillig, 203 N.Y. 413; Williams v. Trecartin, 166 App. Div. 745.) Hagarty, Seeger, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P.J., dissents and votes to affirm.


Summaries of

Colandria v. China Mut. Steam Navigation Co., LTD

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Colandria v. China Mut. Steam Navigation Co., LTD

Case Details

Full title:COSIMO COLANDRIA, as Administrator, etc., of ROCCO COLANDRIA, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1929

Citations

226 App. Div. 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)