From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coker v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 21, 2005
No. CIV-S-05-1814 MCE/CMK P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV-S-05-1814 MCE/CMK P.

October 21, 2005


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On September 15, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 15, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies.


Summaries of

Coker v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 21, 2005
No. CIV-S-05-1814 MCE/CMK P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2005)
Case details for

Coker v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:CHESTER ALLEN COKER, Petitioner, v. DAVID L. RUNNELS, WARDEN, ET AL.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 21, 2005

Citations

No. CIV-S-05-1814 MCE/CMK P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2005)