From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coins v. Harlow

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 11, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-373 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 11, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-373

04-11-2012

MAURICE R. COINS, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL W. HARLOW, Respondent.


ORDER

AND NOW, this __ day of ___________ 2012, after a petition for a writ of habeas corpus was filed by the petitioner, Maurice R, Goins, and after a Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was issued, and the petitioner was accorded an opportunity to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by the petitioner, and after independent review of the petition and the record, and upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which is adopted and incorporated as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition of Maurice R, Goins for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed, and that a certificate of appealability is denied, because reasonable jurists could not conclude that a basis for appeal exists.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the F.R.App.P., if the petitioner desires to appeal from this Order, he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 F.R.App.P.

______________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Coins v. Harlow

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 11, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-373 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Coins v. Harlow

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE R. COINS, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL W. HARLOW, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 11, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-373 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 11, 2012)