From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coicou v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Jan 15, 2020
289 So. 3d 543 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2D17-3544

01-15-2020

Patrick COICOU, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Michael Robert Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Michael Robert Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

BADALAMENTI, Judge.

Patrick Coicou appeals from his convictions and sentences for the offenses of shooting into a dwelling and aggravated battery. We affirm Coicou's convictions and sentences without comment. We write to address an error in Coicou's scoresheet. Although Coicou was convicted following a jury trial, section twelve of his scoresheet erroneously indicates that he entered a guilty plea. Coicou raised this claim in a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) to correct sentencing error, and the trial court granted his motion. However, the record does not contain a corrected scoresheet. We thus remand for the State to file a corrected scoresheet. See Osterhoudt v. State, 182 So. 3d 16, 17 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (remanding with instructions to correct scoresheet that incorrectly indicates that the defendant entered a plea "when, in fact, he was found guilty by a jury after trial").

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

NORTHCUTT and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Coicou v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Jan 15, 2020
289 So. 3d 543 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Coicou v. State

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK COICOU, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Jan 15, 2020

Citations

289 So. 3d 543 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)