Opinion
Argued April 19, 1889
Decided June 4, 1889
Edward P. Wilder for appellant.
Abram Kling for respondents.
EARL, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Cohu v. Husson
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 4, 1889
21 N.E. 703 (N.Y. 1889)
Summaries of
Cohu v. Husson
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 4, 1889
21 N.E. 703 (N.Y. 1889)
Case details for
Cohu v. Husson
Case Details
Full title:JOSEPH S. COHU et al., Administrators, etc., Respondents, v . JOSEPH…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 4, 1889
Citations
21 N.E. 703 (N.Y. 1889)
21 N.E. 703
23 N.Y. St. Rptr. 504
Citing Cases
Strauss v. Trotter
Clark v. Dillon, 97 N.Y. 371. But a defect for which a complaint would be condemned on demurrer will be…
Jacquelin v. Morning Journal AssnThis doctrine of the common law as to express aider has been frequently recognized in our Code pleading.…